Tag: law
-
New Hampshire Considers First-in-the-Nation Move to Abolish Family Court System
New Hampshire’s House Bill 652 proposes significant changes to the family justice system, aiming to replace specialized Family Division courts with a mediation-first model under general jurisdiction courts. Advocates cite issues of bias and inefficiency, while opponents warn of potential chaos and loss of expertise. The bill has reignited a crucial debate on family law’s…
-
AI Hallucinations in Pennsylvania Courts Raise National Questions About Tech and Judicial Integrity
In Pennsylvania, judges face growing issues with “AI hallucinations” in legal filings, leading to fabricated case law and misquotes. A recent court exchange revealed the risks of unverified AI usage. This situation highlights a national concern about the balance between technological adoption and maintaining legal accuracy, threatening public trust and judicial integrity.
-
Justice Denied: Why New York Must Answer for the Prosecution of Marc Fishman
New York’s commitment to criminal justice reform and disability access is questioned in the case of Marc Fishman, a disabled father wrongfully prosecuted. Despite clear evidence of his innocence and misconduct by the arresting officer, prosecutors refuse to reconsider the conviction. This situation exemplifies systemic failures in due process and accountability.
-
Former Broome County Family Court Judge Denied New Trial in Federal Harassment Case
A federal judge upheld a jury’s verdict against former Broome County Judge Richard H. Miller II in a gender-discrimination case, denying his request to overturn the ruling. The jury found Miller liable for creating a hostile environment, awarding $200,000 to former court secretary Rachelle Gallagher and highlighting judicial accountability.
-
When Judges Police Themselves: The Troubling Case of Judge Sarah A.L. Merriam
A complaint against Judge Sarah Merriam of the U.S. Court of Appeals alleges bullying and intimidation, raising concerns about judicial accountability. Previous inquiries deemed her management style excessively harsh. The Legal Accountability Project seeks reforms for protecting clerks, highlighting the judiciary’s reliance on self-policing, which undermines public trust.
-
Brooklyn Family Court Ends Compulsion — But an Autistic Child Remains Missing
A Brooklyn Family Court ruling has relieved Jacqueline Pritchett of further obligations regarding her missing son, Jacob, an autistic boy last seen in 2025. Despite constitutional protections upheld, child safety remains at risk, and authorities lack information or leads in a case raising concerns about parental accountability and systemic failures in child welfare.
-
Brooklyn Court Turmoil Raises Alarming Questions About Political Influence and Judicial Integrity
A legal dispute in Brooklyn Supreme Court involves $2 million in missing escrow funds linked to former Democratic power broker Frank Seddio. The case has seen multiple judicial recusals, raising concerns about political influence and accountability in the justice system. Transparency and timely rulings are essential for restoring public trust.
-
NY’s High Court to Family Judges: You Can’t Take Kids Without Real Lawyers Anymore
New York’s highest court ruled that the government must adhere to constitutional due process when terminating parental rights. The Court of Appeals overturned a case against a Syracuse mother, highlighting the need for effective legal representation for indigent parents. This landmark decision demands reforms to ensure fair hearings in termination cases across the state.
New York Bay News 